Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Carbon Nanotubes and Tire Crumb Rubber infill


In 2012, Jim Novak wrote about Nano particles:
"The concern: Carbon black nanoparticles make up 30 per cent or more of car tires; the same tires that are pulverized for creating the tire crumb used on artificial turf playing fields and on playgrounds for children. Engineered carbon nanotubes and other engineered nanoparticles (zinc, titanium, etc.) are often made in specific shapes to give added strength and durability to tires and other goods. It is the long thin nature of engineered carbon nanotubes that has some scientists drawing a comparison between the possible health hazards of tire crumb with asbestos."

https://www.turfandrec.com/exposure-to-crumb-rubber-nanoparticles-could-lead-to-serious-health-issues-researchers-2986/

Here is a compilation of information on carbon nanotubes:



1.  2017:  Lee Jeremy, & Ramakrishna Seeram. (2017). Carbon Nanotube Wires and Cables: Near‐Term Applications and Future Perspectives. Nanotechnology for Energy Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527696109.ch21
2.  10-4-10:  Mercer, R. R., `Hubbs, A. F., Scabilloni, J. F., Wang, L., Battelli, L. A., Schwegler-Berry, D., … Porter, D. W. (2010). Distribution and persistence of pleural penetrations by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 7, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-28
3.  2-16-16:  Fatkhutdinova, L. M., Khaliullin, T. O., Vasil’yeva, O. L., Zalyalov, R. R., Mustafin, I. G., Kisin, E. R., … Shvedova, A. A. (2016). Fibrosis biomarkers in workers exposed to MWCNTs. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 299, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2016.02.016 

  • 4-29-16:  Nanotechnology especially carbon nanotubes CNTs as very similar to asbestos, National Association of Insurance Commissioners NAIC http://www.naic.org/cipr_topics/topic_nanotechnology.htm   Same conclusion as 12-15 Law360 article from Crowell & Moring on expectation that asbestos law & science will be directly transferred to any future litigation over AT's carbon nanotubes: "If allegations of CNTs in crumb rubber find traction, any challenges or litigation would likely incorporate the world of asbestos medicine and experts.”  https://www.crowell.com/files/20151214-Turf-Wars-The-Attack-On-Crumb-Rubber-Synthetic-Turf-Anderson-Burton.pdf
  • 12-14-15: “Some recent articles make the claim that crumb rubber may contain carbon nanotubes (CNTs). CNTs have come under scrutiny as posing risks similar to those of asbestos fibers.[14] None of the above or other studies or reports specifically addresses (CNTs), but then there is no confirmed evidence that crumb rubber even contains CNTs. If allegations of CNTs in crumb rubber find traction, any challenges or litigation would likely incorporate the world of asbestos medicine and experts.” [citing M. Jacobs, M.. Ellenbecker, et al., Precarious Promise: A Case Study of Engineered Carbon Nanotubes, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Mass. (Mar. 2014)]
Excerpt of summary: “Warning signs have emerged, however. CNTs share important physical characteristics with ultrafine air pollution particles as well as with asbestos fibers – both recognized as seriously toxic. Mounting numbers of toxicological studies now demonstrate irreversible health effects in laboratory animals, but it is unclear whether similar effects have occurred in humans exposed at work or through environmental releases.” (Emphasis added by Diana C.   In my opinion “unclear” re: humans, simply means no one is running a controlled study.  But we are definitely running a completely random experiment.)
AND: 
“It was like a two-legged stool: well founded in physics and chemistry, but flawed by a missing third leg – the biology of the environment [including people].”1(p133) Industrial, agricultural and commercial uses of new synthetic organic chemicals proliferated without attention to public health and environmental impacts. The legacy of this technological revolution is a toxic brew of chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment and in our bodies, resulting in a litany of environmental and public health problems: cancer, groundwater contamination, hormone dysfunction, asthma, fish kills, birth defects and breast milk contamination. Many of these outcomes can be traced back to the chemists’ knowledge, creativity, and market-driven innovation. At the same time, synthetic organic chemistry resulted in tremendous life-saving and life-improving advances: antibiotics, cancer drugs, plastics, and countless industrial chemicals that enable production of nearly every important technology on which our economies depend. We leave it to historians and ethicists to decide if the explosion in innovation from synthetic organic chemistry was “good.”



Thursday, December 5, 2019

Happy Birthday Lew

Nigel has become a friend to many of us who continue to work towards the truth surrounding synthetic turf toxicity. We’ve had many phone calls. He’s a wonderfully humble Englishman, a medical professional: the former chief executive of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) of Cumbria and most importantly: Dad to Lewis Maguire.
“Lew” as Nigel affectionately calls him, lost his battle with cancer in March of 2018. 
Lew was 20 years old had Hodgkin lymphoma and he was an extraordinary Soccer player.
This man is not just forever heartbroken. He and Lew put themselves out there and did everything from writing the highest level of government to appearing on the international media circuit.

They wanted answers.
They wanted regulation.
They wanted change.
All of this while Lew fought cancer.

If you do one thing today, take the time to watch Dangerous Play (load in Chrome for English)

(Around the 34 minute mark) You’ll see Nigel and Lew standing at the gates of his training fields.....
“It looks very innocent...... it brings back bad memories.......I used to bring Lewis here week in and week out. If I knew then what I know now I would have never walked through those gates.” said Nigel.

Be an advocate for your child, be sure to look at the artificial grass they are playing on. Ask questions and don’t accept empty or vague answers.
We know plenty about tire crumb and now various types of #PFAS has become a true discovery at various levels in artificial grass.

There’s a simply wonderful answer and it’s grass. You have the power and the right to ask your child’s coach, school, town, sports league, soccer club (etc) to put their play on grass.

So what’s true? Nigel said: "I will continue to press for answers, not least because Lewis wanted those answers and I owe it to him to get them." and we’re with you Nigel.

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Keavany: Put moratorium on synthetic turf

June 06. 2016 11:51PM

There has been much discussion and a great deal of heated rhetoric lately regarding the use of synthetic turf (comprised of monofilament carpet with tired derived “crumb rubber” infill) in Medway. Those in favor argue that synthetic turf is a cost effective alternative to natural grass. However those opposed to synthetic turf are very concerned about the long-term effects that these materials may have on our children. To date limited studies on synthetic turf have estimated that any potential release of toxic chemicals would be “below the levels of concern.”
On February 12, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched a multi-agency action plan to study key environmental human health questions related to crumb rubber exposure. In April 2016 a group of concerned parents from Medway got together and filed a citizens petition (Article 1) which would put a three-year moratorium on the installation of synthetic turf with crumb rubber infill in the town. Their goal is to obtain more information about the long term effects of tire derived crumb rubber infill and its potential effects on the children that play on these fields.
For the record I am not a scientist, researcher or doctor. I am simply a concerned parent of three school-aged children (10, 9 and 5 years of age) who play sports regularly. I do not know what the results of the EPA study will be but I see NO downside to approving a temporary halt of any further installation of tire derived crumb rubber until we have a better idea of the long term impact to our children.
On Thursday, June 9, the residents of Medway will vote on Article 1, which will put a 3-year moratorium on the engineering, planning, construction or installation of any synthetic turf (monofilament carpet with tire derived infill). What does this mean? Voting YES on the article only affects the future use of tire-derived crumb rubber, nothing more. Existing fields can still be used and public parks projects can still move forward using alternative materials. I urge all Medway residents to vote YES on Article 1 to allow the EPA the time to research this topic more extensively.
LUKE KEAVANY
Medway

Saturday, June 4, 2016

Playground Surfacing - What are the options?


Submitted by Andrea S. Kerr, AIA
Residents in Medway, MA still have questions regarding the confusion surrounding Article 1, which goes to vote June 9, 2016. The article is for the adoption of a moratorium on any tire derived products for the next three years until the research that has been mandated related to crumb rubber is concluded. Some residents and town officials mistakenly thought the moratorium would affect Article 2, which intends to upgrade many parks and playgrounds areas in our town.
The following information may be helpful to other communities as they contemplate what products to utilize for similar improvements over the next 3 years.
That said, I believe firmly that factual data is the key to any informed decision, so I took the time to compile information in two different documents; 
  • One document states all the legal requirements for compliant surfaces for playground spaces.  The information is taken directly from the regulations and agencies. 
  • The second document is a compilation of various surfacing materials and indicates various factors - materials, recycled rubber content, ASTM testing, ADA compliance, cost and other applicable information.  It is by no means the limit of materials - there are many more available for use, and focus was on the tested products noted in the CPSC list. 
It was meant to let our residents know that when time comes to pick surfaces for the playground projects, which hopefully move forward, there are MANY COMPLIANT OPTIONS, of varying costs!  It also very clearly states that there are NO aquatic products that utilize recycled rubber.
I am hopeful that my fellow Medway residents find this information helpful in making a decision this coming Thursday.  The information reinforces the message that voting YES for Article 1, is a smart pause as we wait for science to catch up with the products and voting YES for Article 1 will not affect Article 2, which I also plan to vote yes for.

 
Andrea Kerr is a registered architect that has been designing hospitals for almost 20 years.  Accessibility is part of her every day, as are the associated regulations. All information is taken DIRECTLY from manufacturer CSI (specifications) with supplemental information from discussions with reps.  Any items in a grey tone were not able to be filled in as of this  posting.
 


Thursday, January 14, 2016

Will California Play Fair with Synthetic Turf?


California has been passed the ball -- to conduct a realistic and credible study of tire crumb synthetic turf.
Does the government have what it takes?
​The following is a chronicling of its progress, (and history):